Automated Budgeting & User Trust
Usability Study

This project explores how users perceive control and automation in mobile financial systems.

UX Research · Moderated usability testing · Mobile app · Users: 10

The Challenge

How do you design automated financial systems users trust, without making them feel they’ve lost control?

My role

  • Defined research objectives and hypotheses

  • Designed test scenarios and tasks

  • Moderated usability sessions

  • Analyzed behavioral patterns and mental models

  • Synthesized insights into actionable recommendations

  • Presented findings to design and product stakeholders

Context

Modern personal finance apps increasingly rely on automation to help users manage budgets, savings, and spending without constant manual input.

This study explores how users perceive and interact with automated financial systems, how they balance trust and control, and what happens when they make manual adjustments while the system continues adapting in the background.

User persona

Alex, 34 — Consultant

  • A professional who wants financial stability with minimal mental effort.

  • Trusts automation as default

  • Intervenes only when something feels off

  • Cares about outcomes, not system logic

Mental model

“As long as the outcome is good and the app warns me when something goes wrong, I don’t need to control every detail.”

Goals - What we wanted to learn

Modern personal finance apps increasingly rely on automation to help users manage budgets, savings, and spending without constant manual input.

This study explores how users perceive and interact with automated financial systems, how they balance trust and control, and what happens when they make manual adjustments while the system continues adapting in the background.

Methodology

  • Explorative Studies

    - Moderated usability testing with 10 users using an interactive mobile prototype.

    - Exploratory tasks and guided configuration tasks

    - Qualitative insights supported by behavioral metrics

  • Journey Mapping

    Mapping the end-to-end experience from opening the app to stabilizing the budget in order to identify key pain points such as unclear system feedback, misunderstood automation states, and moments of lost user confidence, as well as opportunities to reinforce trust, provide reassurance, and surface smart recommendations at the right time.

User Flow

Key Findings

  • Most users rely on automatic budgeting as their baseline experience.

  • Many users believe automation is disabled after a single manual adjustment, even when it’s still active.

  • Re-activating automation is often a reassurance action, not a real need.

User Awareness of Ongoing Automation

Feature ranking

Smart financial suggestions are highly valued when discovered, but suffer from low visibility and discoverability.

Design Implications

  • Automation should be clearly active, but never intrusive

  • Partial manual actions should not feel like “losing control”

  • Smart features need contextual surfacing, not more settings

Anterior
Anterior

Fitness App Dashboard

Siguiente
Siguiente

Understanding Gen Z & Alpha Shoppers